PDA

View Full Version : Inzaghi goal [that was]

westboy
24-05-2007, 18:34
Am I right in saying that it should have stood as it was ball to hand, even though that meant he legally scored with his hand.

What's the rule on this notts_ref?
FourOneFourOne
24-05-2007, 18:56
Definite ball-to-hand, he's not even looking at the ball is he?
RedRabbit
24-05-2007, 19:15
As much as I disliked it at the time, it was ball-2-hand. So, yes it stands.
triniboi101
24-05-2007, 19:29
nah man. still handball in my case. he turned around caus he knew the ball would hit his hand and hence went in the goal.
Middlesbrough No1 Fan
24-05-2007, 19:38
You cant even complain about that goal.. the speed it was going nobody knew it was even handball till after the match when we saw the replays. Liverppool can try to use it as an excuse but they simply were shite upfront, thats why they lost..
cliffy
24-05-2007, 19:43
You cant even complain about that goal.. the speed it was going nobody knew it was even handball till after the match when we saw the replays. Liverppool can try to use it as an excuse but they simply were shite upfront, thats why they lost..


Couldn't have put it better myself :nodyes:
westboy
24-05-2007, 19:48
nah man. still handball in my case. he turned around caus he knew the ball would hit his hand and hence went in the goal.

:roflmao:

Always nice to get an unbiased view...
Middlesbrough No1 Fan
24-05-2007, 20:02
How could he know it was going to hit his hand.. at that speed :hahaha: deflected goal, get over it
triniboi101
24-05-2007, 21:14
not deflected goal more like bullshit goal
boro_boy
24-05-2007, 21:16
Get over it. :)
triniboi101
24-05-2007, 21:18
lol i over it man just the thought that we shudve won the game so early on is just upseting
boro_boy
24-05-2007, 21:21
I know, I know how you feel kind of :). We got hammered 4-0 in a final!! But you didn't have the right people in attack, Crouch should have been on from the start. Shit happens!! :)
triniboi101
24-05-2007, 21:24
yeh yeh but it wasnt our day. out day will come oh and di u remember that hammering last year?? did u turn off the tv or just cried after?
Middlesbrough No1 Fan
24-05-2007, 21:57
yeh yeh but it wasnt our day. out day will come oh and di u remember that hammering last year?? did u turn off the tv or just cried after?

Aye remember that happening too well.. but was an amazing achievement getting there..

What liverpool need is two new wingers.. Zenden and Pennant did F all when they got the ball.. and with 1 forward on the pitch you need your wingers to play well..

And you have to question rafas decision to replace maschareno
Evertonscouser
24-05-2007, 22:18
Kaka was sure to score twice IMO when Liverpool were let off. Once with the offside decision which left him 1 on 1 with Reina, with Reina in no mans' land and then wen Kaka went past Caragher and he basically clotheslined him lol.
wednesday4life
24-05-2007, 23:55
nah man. still handball in my case. he turned around caus he knew the ball would hit his hand and hence went in the goal.
fine- it was handball, come on eeryone admit it

then again, kuyt was offside for his, so thats 2 disallowed and a 1-0 win for milan anyway
triniboi101
25-05-2007, 02:41
nah man. if u av a close look, it comes off of one of the milan defenders and kuyt is not considered offside because of this and besides even if it didnt come off of the milan head....half his body was onside and the other half was not....God help a fat player...
wednesday4life
25-05-2007, 07:37
i you wastch you'll realise that it was headed on by a liverpool player before being DEFLECTED by a milan player therefore kuyt is still offside
westboy
25-05-2007, 10:33
Glad i didn't have money on 2-0
TheManInBlack
25-05-2007, 15:43
I thought it was more of a shoulder, personally.
I_AM_CANADIAN!
25-05-2007, 16:18
I saw it and I just thought it hit his body as did everyone else at the game probably, he didn't even see it coming. Anyway, it's over and done with, AC Milan are 7-time European Champions. :red:
joe8877
29-05-2007, 17:55
get over it, Liverpool should have won but didn't because they weren't good enough.
triniboi101
30-05-2007, 00:22
werent good enough??? HOW!?? elaborate please!
Kolo
30-05-2007, 03:26
werent good enough??? HOW!?? elaborate please!

what he probably means is, Milan were better on the night, and outclassed liverpool, liverpool did play ok, but not good enough, as he said
wednesday4life
30-05-2007, 10:54
no, he probably means they were tripe- they couldn't find a way through despite being in controll of the game
I_AM_CANADIAN!
30-05-2007, 12:07
werent good enough??? HOW!?? elaborate please!

a) Milan scored two goals.

b) Liverpool only scored one.

Quite simple, really. I don't get why people keep whinging about how Liverpool played better, when they only managed one lucky goal from a corner that took a deflection off of Maldini.
Kolo
30-05-2007, 12:10
Quite simple, really. I don't get why people keep whinging about how Liverpool played better, when they only managed one lucky goal from a corner that took a deflection off of Maldini.

*crouch flick-on
westboy
30-05-2007, 17:59
werent good enough??? HOW!?? elaborate please!
At the end of the day football is about winning matches and scoring more goals than the other team not discussing who is the better team but no way did Liverpool deserve to win. For a start their was a foul in the build up to the goal they scored against Chelsea and in the final their second goal was offside and so that cancels out inzaghis fluke. Not that it matters.