Aye, ain't he like 1 of the richest kids in the UK? Or the richest.... What a lucky twat.
Daniel Radcliffe, the kid that plays Harry Potter, has just signed a deal to play the role of Potter for the last 2 films. Of course, the kid knows (or his agent really), that the producers are aware that he is essential. There would be no Potter without him, so they pay accordingly. The new deal is worth $50 million ($25mil per film)
I should have been a child staryes:
Aye, ain't he like 1 of the richest kids in the UK? Or the richest.... What a lucky twat.
He must be one of the richest kids in the world maybe, $50m is a fooking lot of cash, lucky bastardyes:

thats about $50 million more than i got and im 26
Some Bloke In Boro with Toon Flags on there house, so brave
Also he is a mormon

Shit happens, would you really want $50m?
Yes I WOULD!!!!![]()
Don't Like A Member? Add them to you Ignore List
congratz to him lucky bugger...
I hate him, love the books but WB ruined the films. Also when he was first interviewed he said he liked watching WWF wrestling... Dumb bainch
I honestly wouldn't like that type of money, would just make me feel guilty.
Imagine having £50 million and knowing the sort of poverty that's in the world.
Well i'd give a little bit of it to charity if I had that much. I've always wondered why the likes of Bill Gates or Richard Branson dont donate some to charity, like it will harm them.
I agree with username, i dont watch hp but if he left the films obviously wouldnt be as appealing.
Bill Gates has turned into a philanthropist now to be fair, and he's "only" going to leave £100 million to his kid.
Ah wellI didnt know that. I read about what Branson is doing - I read months ago he was giving millions to the person who removed over a billion tons of carbon emmision in the atmosphere (i think). Not that anyone can be bothered anyway with "global warming".