Daniel Radcliffe - a filthy rich kid

[RedRabbit]

Daniel Radcliffe, the kid that plays Harry Potter, has just signed a deal to play the role of Potter for the last 2 films. Of course, the kid knows (or his agent really), that the producers are aware that he is essential. There would be no Potter without him, so they pay accordingly. The new deal is worth $50 million ($25mil per film)

I should have been a child star yes:

[Craig]

Aye, ain't he like 1 of the richest kids in the UK? Or the richest.... What a lucky twat.

[VidicMonster]

He must be one of the richest kids in the world maybe, $50m is a fooking lot of cash, lucky bastard yes:

[Simonutd]

thats about $50 million more than i got and im 26

[Craig]

Originally Posted by simonutd

thats about $50 million more than i got and im 26

Don't forget the 4 other movies + the interest he gets. Me thinks get got alot more than £30m atleast....

[boro_boy]

**** happens, would you really want $50m?























Yes I WOULD!!!!

[westboy]

congratz to him lucky bugger...

I hate him, love the books but WB ruined the films. Also when he was first interviewed he said he liked watching WWF wrestling... Dumb bainch

[FourOneFourOne]

I honestly wouldn't like that type of money, would just make me feel guilty.

Imagine having £50 million and knowing the sort of poverty that's in the world.

[TorquayMadChris]

Celeb's being Celeb's these day's he is probably going to do a 'madonna' And adopt Some baby from Malawi.

and replying to the first thread , of course no hp film is without him...Hes the main star.

[VidicMonster]

Originally Posted by FourOneFourOne

I honestly wouldn't like that type of money, would just make me feel guilty.
Imagine having £50 million and knowing the sort of poverty that's in the world.

Well i'd give a little bit of it to charity if I had that much. I've always wondered why the likes of Bill Gates or Richard Branson dont donate some to charity, like it will harm them.

I agree with username, i dont watch hp but if he left the films obviously wouldnt be as appealing.

[FourOneFourOne]

Bill Gates has turned into a philanthropist now to be fair, and he's "only" going to leave £100 million to his kid.

[Craig]

Originally Posted by Ronaldo

Well i'd give a little bit of it to charity if I had that much. I've always wondered why the likes of Bill Gates or Richard Branson dont donate some to charity, like it will harm them.
I agree with username, i dont watch hp but if he left the films obviously wouldnt be as appealing.

Over 95% of Bill Gates money is going to charity when he dies, leaving the kids with a good couple of hundred million each. Branson gives alot of money into slowing down global warming etc with his own bio-fuel.

[VidicMonster]

Ah well I didnt know that. I read about what Branson is doing - I read months ago he was giving millions to the person who removed over a billion tons of carbon emmision in the atmosphere (i think). Not that anyone can be bothered anyway with "global warming".

[TorquayMadChris]

Originally Posted by Craig

Over 95% of Bill Gates money is going to charity when he dies, leaving the kids with a good couple of hundred million each. Branson gives alot of money into slowing down global warming etc with his own bio-fuel.

But branson has 11 Rolls Royce's ALL Petrol....:yikes: