![]() |
||
|
|
||
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
can't believe i missed this
Quote:
replay the match- i'm sure thats what arsenal did the years ago when the blunts kicked up a fuss (something to do with an injury and a throw-in if i remember rightly) |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yeah. Thats old new mate ha ha! Hopefully they replay the match as City vs boro is much more exciting than blunts v boro.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
replay the match. that would be a joke. they lost the match simple as. get over it. The ref asked the keeper to pop them when the ball was at the other end of the pitch and he didnt.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
sheff utd fans should be asking for it replayed- when they screamed about arsenal what happened didn't breach any rule whatsoever. this one, as far as my interpretation goes did as surely a balloon is classed as an external party- that would have to cause the game to be stopped
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
yes:
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes they have brains lol but had the ball hit a balloon in the centre of the pitch then the referee restarts with a dropped ball. This same concept should be applied in this instance IMO.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sven should be done for attempted manslaughter "We asked the fourth official to tell the referee Alan Wiley to stop the game and take away the balloons or kill them"
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
surely that would be attempted balloon slaughter- no men were involved
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
They should have been complaining before the goal went in. They were obviously happy with the situation before the goal went in. Any excuse.
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
sven did complain
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well they should have protested on the pitch. If it was that bad. They could have refused to play until the balloons were removed.
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
if a ref won't do what he's supposed to after interference from an outside agent, do you really think that would work?
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|