Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
sployal

Cricket World Cup

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Hairy Scot said:

Based on my support priorities I was hoping for a tie or NR.

:mischievous-grin-smiley-emoticon:

Aye well, your hope went doon the cludgie........:flashing-lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Harold said:

Aye well, your hope went doon the cludgie........:flashing-lol:

I still think the top four will be (in no particular order) OZ, NZ, England, India.
However NZ has three tough games to come.
Would love to see NZ vs OZ final.

               
                 
                 
   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, The Guv'nor said:

I think NZ will beat Pakistan today and qualify.

I agree. The Pakis have been far from their best, but.....................

NZ should also beat the Poms and the Convicts, but those will be very tight games methinks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Hairy Scot said:

I still think the top four will be (in no particular order) OZ, NZ, England, India.
However NZ has three tough games to come.
Would love to see NZ vs OZ final.

               
                 
                 
   

England haven't got it easy either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Ian Smith is a wanker!
Game not even started and he's second guessing already.

And who the fuck wears tan shoes with a blue suit!!
Height of sartorial ignorance!!

WTF does McCullum have on his feet??
 

Dunno if you guys see the same coverage as I do, but it really pisses me of when a bunch of has beens stand there and state the obvious.

 

Five "situation" in one sentence FFS!!!!

Edited by Hairy Scot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This partnership has the potential to take it away from the Pakis.
Just have to hope that Taylor doesn't get his partner run out.

OH DEAR!!
Well at least it wasn't a run out.

 

Why are they using a used pitch?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, The Guv'nor said:

Pakistan up for this one.

Very much a home fixture for them and it is showing in their play.

Yep, they have the crowd.
We can afford to drop this one so long as we can beat the Poms and the Convicts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

I think that is this one gone.
Unless NZ can bowl the Pakis out cheaply.
Still can't understand why a ripped up old wicket was used when there where others available.
Just have to see off the Poms and/or the convicts.

 

Edited by Hairy Scot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Hairy Scot said:

I think that is this one gone.
Unless NZ can bowl the Pakis out cheaply.
Still can't understand why a ripped up old wicket was used when there where others available.
Just have to see off the Poms and/or the convicts.

 

Convicts will be an easier bet as they have qualified. May play a couple second string players and rest big guns.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish I had ben christened Imad.

1 minute ago, The Guv'nor said:

Convicts will be an easier bet as they have qualified. May play a couple second string players and rest big guns.

Not against NZ. Four years of bragging rights at stake

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

200 might be defensible on this wicket. It's like a ploughed field.

Still cannot understand why this track was chosen.

 

Maybe I'm old fashioned or out of touch, but my batting coach taught me to attack spinners; get down the wicket and hit it before it hits the ground, turn it into a full toss.

I wish the commentators would talk sense.

220 will do it.

Edited by Hairy Scot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Forum Statistics

    3,827
    Total Topics
    37,284
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    413
    Total Members
    3,654
    Most Online
    noithathoathinh
    Newest Member
    noithathoathinh
    Joined


My Football Forum

Nearing 20 years old, My Football Forum was Established in March 2002 making us one of the original football forums. For years fans have been discussing the great game we love!

Your Links Here

This is an example of a list.

Your Link and Description Here

Email My Football Forum if your interested in having your website promoted here

Your Link and Description Here

Email My Football Forum if your interested in having your website promoted here

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.