Jump to content

On this day in History


Guest

Recommended Posts

On 08/11/2019 at 13:46, Harold said:

This was also the birth date in 1966 of Rangers legend Gordon Ramsay.

Legend???? Seriously! Tho he went on to achieve great things in his life, his contribution to Gers isn't one of them. Without that injury who knows, tho thing's have probably worked out better for him because of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, The Realist said:

Legend???? Seriously! Tho he went on to achieve great things in his life, his contribution to Gers isn't one of them. Without that injury who knows, tho thing's have probably worked out better for him because of it.

 

3 hours ago, Normski said:

He was taking the piss

 

On 09/11/2019 at 02:46, Harold said:

This was also the birth date in 1966 of Rangers legend Gordon Ramsay.

Can't we have one thread that is free of nonsense?

Edited by Guest
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Hairy Scot said:

Can't we have one thread that is free of nonsense?

OK, fill your boots Hairy....although I will point out that you did gave my post a 'like'. Perhaps you should have mentioned your objections at that pont!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Harold said:

OK, fill your boots Hairy....although I will point out that you did gave my post a 'like'. Perhaps you should have mentioned your objections at that pont!

At that pont?

You know, your dual standards are becoming more apparent all the time.
You preach law and order and then do as you please.

GIRFUY! You hypocrite!

Edited by Guest
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hairy Scot said:

At that pont?

Oh dear. slap my wrist....:flashing-lol:

2 minutes ago, Hairy Scot said:

You know, your dual standards are becoming more apparent all the time.
You preach law and order and then do as you please.

There is nothing in my post to indicate dual standards & perhaps you could produce an example of same ?

3 minutes ago, Hairy Scot said:

GIRFUY!

Not very nice is it ?

 

You did give ithe post a like though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Harold said:

Oh dear. slap my wrist....:flashing-lol:

There is nothing in my post to indicate dual standards & perhaps you could produce an example of same ?

We see them on a daily basis.

Not very nice is it ?

 

You did give ithe post a like though.

A misclick which I did not deem of sufficient importance to cancel.

 

Today's track shall be Harold's song ad infinitum.    :-)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hairy Scot said:

We see them on a daily basis

quote one please.

2 minutes ago, Hairy Scot said:

Today's track shall be Harold's song ad infinitum.

Is this really you Hairy....or has someone hacked you again ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Harold said:

OK, fill your boots Hairy....although I will point out that you did gave my post a 'like'. Perhaps you should have mentioned your objections at that pont!

 

 

4 minutes ago, Harold said:

quote one please.

Is this really you Hairy....or has someone hacked you again ?

Just to be clear, my initial complaint was not about your post but about the side track it initiated.
However, your negative overreaction triggered my deep seated bullshit sensors

In the interests of keeping this thread pure, perhaps you could remove the dross.

My apologies for my overreaction.

Edited by Guest
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Hairy Scot said:

Just to be clear, my initial complaint was not about your post

OK....we've clarified that.

5 minutes ago, Hairy Scot said:

but about the side track it initiated

Two posts ? Side tracked ?....Realist queried my post as he obviously thought I was being serious & Norm said correctly in what manner the was was meant to be taken.....and that was it.

7 minutes ago, Hairy Scot said:

However, your negative overreaction

you took umbridge because you thought my reply was a negative overreaction ? Jeezo.....your prerogative though!

Now let's see some quotes of which you accuse me ? Either that or it is laid to rest and you can have the thread to yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Harold said:

OK....we've clarified that.

Two posts ? Side tracked ?....Realist queried my post as he obviously thought I was being serious & Norm said correctly in what manner the was was meant to be taken.....and that was it.

you took umbridge because you thought my reply was a negative overreaction ? Jeezo.....your prerogative though!

Now let's see some quotes of which you accuse me ? Either that or it is laid to rest and you can have the thread to yourself.

You're a changed man Harold. I don't think you're cut out for the task you've assumed.
You're prejudiced and blinkered.

Edited by Guest
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Hairy Scot said:

I don't think you're cut out for the task you've assumed

But I do as does BB.

48 minutes ago, Hairy Scot said:

You're prejudiced and blinkered.

Again you make an accusation which you cannot back up.....and anyway, for someone who was not happy with a couple of extra comments interrupting the flow of the thread, you're making a good job of it yourself. I suggest that this is called a halt to in the interest of your thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Forum Statistics

    6.9k
    Total Topics
    175.7k
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    819
    Total Members
    3,654
    Most Online
    shiva1993
    Newest Member
    shiva1993
    Joined
  • New users  2 New users online in the last 24 hours

×
×
  • Create New...